Walt Mankowski on Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:10:13 +0100 |
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:39:37AM -0500, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > Oh, and fwiw, I *strongly* disagree with indent. 8-character-tabs > waste a ridiculous amount of screen real estate, and programs that > use tabs as "binary short hand" for 8 spaces (as emacs does) break > with almost everything else out there (let's see: cat, more, less, > ed, vi, grep, guess I'll stop there). As he outlines in the CodingStyle document, Linus had very good reasons for going with 8-character tabs. Having said that, I use 4-character tabs myself. :-) > I agree with JWZ: the only way to be safe if anyone else will ever > look at your code is to convert all tabs to the number of spaces you > think they should be when you close the file. (He's got a nice > lambda function to do this in the tabs-vs-spaces document mentioned > above.) When I want to get rid of tabs, I just mark the entire buffer with C-x h, then run C-x untabify. Walt Attachment:
pgpWLJU4jwqgb.pgp
|
|