Mike Leone on Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:41:24 -0500 |
> I could have sworn that i've set up read only support for coworkers running > win2000 here... I think darxus has even done the rw support although i > don't know if he used it before wiping his drive when he worked with me. > I could be wrong I tried to get everyone to convert to fat32 to prevent > issues. I don't have a Win2K NTFS partition handy to verify, but I know that was the advice given on one of my other mailing lists, when others had problems accessing Win2K partitions. You're right; FAT32 is easier/better for situations like this. However, NTFS partitions are generally better for Win systems (journalling, ACLs, etc - none of which FAT32 does). > > N-Tropy > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Mike Leone wrote: > > > Yes. Not with Linux, tho, as Linux does not support NTFS v5, which is used > > in Win2K. Only NTFS for NT. And even then, the writing of NTFS is considered > > experimental and dangerous. > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug > > ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|