Re: [PLUG] Re: PGP & GPG compatibility (fwd)

["Michael D. Barlow" <mdbarlow@erols.com>]

Sorry, I restated the obvious, I just went back and re read the forwarded 
message on the first post
.

Peace
At 12:58 PM 1/19/02 -0500, you wrote:
> On 01/19, Michael F. Robbins wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 12:16, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:52:59AM -0500, christophe barbé wrote:
> > > > It's not clear to me if you use PGP or GPG but I use GPG and your
> > > > signature is correctly verified.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the lack of clarity. (I use GPG 1.0.6.)
> > >
> > > For a while, there was some problem with my signatures looking bad
> > > to people using NAI's PGP... I'm not sure if it's still true, or if
> > > that person's getting an updated key from me fixed it. (In the
> >
> > I use GPG 1.0.6 as well.  You know what's even weirder?  Your first
> > message (the original forward) came out as a bad signature, but this
> > last one was a good signature.  I'm using Evolution, which has a nice
> > little lock button that checks the sig...
>
> Very odd, I've gotten "Good signature" on every message that's signed in
> this thread, and I'm also running GPG v1.0.6.  With mutt v1.2.5i.
>
> --
> "It's never too late to panic."
> http://www.ChaosReigns.com


______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -      http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  -  http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug