| Michael D. Barlow on Sat, 19 Jan 2002 13:44:53 -0500 |
|
Hello all, newguy here. fFor the past few weeks I have been experimenting with openpgp for the palm os. I have definitely been coming across compatibility issues between the gnupg windows port and the pgp for palm. It seems that pgp does not like the comments created by gpg as well as some of the algorithms under gpg when I try to transfer the secret key over to the handheld. I am not sure about the public key import, but will post when I come to that bridge. It is a work in progress as I am definitely a newbie. I have several installs under my belt, but I essentially walked away from the command line in 1989, and am getting back into it slowly with linux. At 12:58 PM 1/19/02 -0500, you wrote: On 01/19, Michael F. Robbins wrote: > On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 12:16, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:52:59AM -0500, christophe barbé wrote: > > > It's not clear to me if you use PGP or GPG but I use GPG and your > > > signature is correctly verified. > > > > Sorry for the lack of clarity. (I use GPG 1.0.6.) > > > > For a while, there was some problem with my signatures looking bad > > to people using NAI's PGP... I'm not sure if it's still true, or if > > that person's getting an updated key from me fixed it. (In the > > I use GPG 1.0.6 as well. You know what's even weirder? Your first > message (the original forward) came out as a bad signature, but this > last one was a good signature. I'm using Evolution, which has a nice > little lock button that checks the sig... ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|