| Darxus on Sat, 19 Jan 2002 12:59:41 -0500 |
|
On 01/19, Michael F. Robbins wrote: > On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 12:16, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:52:59AM -0500, christophe barbé wrote: > > > It's not clear to me if you use PGP or GPG but I use GPG and your > > > signature is correctly verified. > > > > Sorry for the lack of clarity. (I use GPG 1.0.6.) > > > > For a while, there was some problem with my signatures looking bad > > to people using NAI's PGP... I'm not sure if it's still true, or if > > that person's getting an updated key from me fixed it. (In the > > I use GPG 1.0.6 as well. You know what's even weirder? Your first > message (the original forward) came out as a bad signature, but this > last one was a good signature. I'm using Evolution, which has a nice > little lock button that checks the sig... Very odd, I've gotten "Good signature" on every message that's signed in this thread, and I'm also running GPG v1.0.6. With mutt v1.2.5i. -- "It's never too late to panic." http://www.ChaosReigns.com Attachment:
pgp29uCzqf2OU.pgp
|
|