|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
multiple seriousity <msimons@slackware.com> writes:
> And if there isn't enough resources to keep Linux ported to Sparc, then I
> would seriously doubt porting all of Debian GNU userland to the NetBSD
> kernel to be a successful ongoing effort. If you want debian, then you've
> got Debian-sparc and debian sparc64, if these dont have enough effort
> behind them..
Good points.
Anyway, I just compared, and debian sparc64 has a better network
install/rescue than NetBSD sparc64. I was very surprised, I
thought the *BSD would be more clever.
Chris
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|