| gabriel rosenkoetter on Tue, 22 Jan 2002 03:40:17 +0100 |
|
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 04:01:38PM -0500, Chris Beggy wrote: > Anyway, I just compared, and debian sparc64 has a better network > install/rescue than NetBSD sparc64. I was very surprised, I > thought the *BSD would be more clever. sysinst (NetBSD's installer) sucks on all archs. You actually saw one of the better ones (presuming it behaves about as well as it does on sparc). Nobody in the NetBSD community ever claimed we were user friendly. (And if they did, they should have been shot for it. ;^>) It's precisely things like this that make me think that someone like Debian dressing NetBSD (or, really, any BSD, though I'm rather fond of NetBSD personally, and also happen to think it's technically superior in a lot of important--design-oriented--ways) up would be a Good Idea. I'd even like to help... only but I've got these three unsupported processors lying around, and that's just more fun to play with. :^> -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpRSNvMmafIk.pgp
|
|