Jon Galt on Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:50:12 +0100 |
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Mike Leone wrote: > I can open ports on my firewall, but not have daemons listening on those ports, nor forwarded to any other machine. And what level of hardware or software rejects traffic when a port is closed? > > Denial of Service, I assume that means. Which situation would allow DOS: > > Yep. > > > having the port closed, or open but not listened to? I would think the > > former, but I'm not sure yet that I know what "closed" means. > > Well, consider: whether or not a port is open, or listened to, or whatever ... if I decide to send 400 million packets at you, on port 53, say ... unless you have some upstream way of blocking those packets, your line going to be flooded with incoming packets. Nothing else will be able to get in (effectively speaking), nor can you get out, because your bandwidth is being chewed up by all those incoming packets. Even if you're not processing them, they're still coming in.. Ok, that makes sense. And it seems to apply whether the port is opened or closed, listened to or not...? Wayne ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|