pinkee on Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:20:14 +0100 |
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 05:44:10AM -0800, JP Toto wrote: > Im gonna have to disagree with alot of this so far. > While I DO agree that tossing around job postings on > the PLUG list is probably inappropriate - perhaps we > could add a job section to the PLUG web site that > regulars could post to? I know there are a few links > there already... The point is that there are still > alot of unemployed folks out there who would like to > have any job... regardless of whether it's > administering NT or Unix or Linux or whatever. For you > to balk at non-linux job postings in this day and age > is bad form. Certainly I think the list should stay on > topic but to complain when a well-intentioned member > is trying to help out his fellow linux users with the > prospect of employment is just wrong. This is well said, and I like the proposal. It would minimize oversite on the part of the *volunteers* who keep plug running smoothly. Attempting to impose fees or fines is ridiculous, and indicates a serious lack of recognition of all the work the *volunteers* already do. > That said... Im happy to write or help write or > upgrade the PLUG job section to allow for posts. We > could setup some kind of time limit so they'de > disapear after awhile. I like this too. Offering to help solve a problem is cool. > Sure administering NT isn't as nice or as fun as linux > but there are some people out there who need jobs and > who wouldn't mind splitting a referral bonus. Don't > speak for them just because your job requirments allow > for linux ONLY. Two of the volunteers for PLUG are unemployed. I am confident windows would seem better than a cardboard box with a skylight. pinkee -- www.cavegirl.org www.mydarlingchild.com "And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners." --Berke Breathed, in an interview by _The Onion_ Attachment:
pgpmEW44cOOoK.pgp
|
|