kevin mudrick on Wed, 17 Apr 2002 19:50:16 +0200 |
> Can I ask what the point of this would be? You would already be > transmitting the message en clair to the list itself, which would defeat > the purpose of encrypting it later. Or are you talking about having a > master list key that one would encrypt to, to avoid the cleartext issue? > > (No, I don't know of any myself. Just wondering about the motivation.) Yeah, the idea would be to have a master list key that members would encrypt to, so nothing would be sent over any wires in the clear. Paranoid friends ;) Though I guess, a password-protected, ssl-served web-based message forum might work too... -kevin -- (kevin mudrick) (kevin@furhurts.com) (www.bleachedwhale.com) pgp key available at http://www.furhurts.com/~darkspur/kevin_gpg.asc Despair: It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|