Michael Leone on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:38:22 -0400 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24 Apr 2002 at 12:28, Jon Galt wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Michael Leone wrote: > > > They might be able to force an audit via the BSA. I worked for a > > place once that got sued by the BSA for license violations; it was a > > long, extended, extremely agrravating 2.5 yrs ... > > And how did BSA gather their information about the software being > used? The usual - the guy who had my job before me got pissed off, and told the BSA. > I used to work somewhere that got a letter from BSA about doing some > kind of audit. I don't remember the details, but they just blew it > off and, so far as I know, never heard from BSA again. Those letters are a different matter, than a targeted audit, and legal suit. ISTR the BSA wanted $300K in damages at first (we had something like 25 WordPerfect and Lotus 1-2-3 violations - this was 1996, I believe; I started at the beginning of 97, and the case was in progress). They settled for like $25K (after 2.5 yrs of the lawyers jabbering at each other), and the right to come in and audit every x number of months. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjzG7ZkACgkQmrQe9lqlvN+ymACg2yMtbnQJpKAOdgl8QTMK7prn si4AoOpFLJtny+IENDVlG2Rn27adgMO8 =exEa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|