| gabriel rosenkoetter on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:16:47 -0400 |
|
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:42:17PM -0400, Time wrote: > Why? Because MUTT attaches the signature instead of putting it into the > message body while PINE puts the sig stuff into the body. Mutt creates a PGP/MIME message according to RFC 2015. The real solution is for U Washington to get with the program and support that. Till it does, here's a procmail recipe to just change the MIME type on incoming messages back to plain text (signatures are plain text; the octet-string label is just so that they can be called PGP for MUAs aware of that MIME type): http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/2001.10/msg00028.html Use procmail as your local delivery agent and run all incoming messages through this. (Note that this will irritate your mutt users, but it's really easy for them to just do a |gpg --verify, so they shouldn't whine much.) Also, make sure you read the followup to that if you're using pinepg. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpYa2OBp3CqD.pgp
|
|