|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] Re: Mutt & Pine & GnuPG & Mental Health
|
Considering how *Few* email programs have encryption support built in at
all, I think people should be happy about evolution supporting it, and
try to help solve problems.
I don't use the encryption features so heavily, but I have yet to have a
problem decryption a message or verifying a sig (assuming that I have
the proper keys). fyi: I have used evo 1.0.2, and am currently on
1.0.3.
-- noah silva
On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 22:36, Michael Leone wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 17:36, Darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> > On 04/24, Noah silva wrote:
> > > Anybody want me to check to see which way evolution does it? (it's a
> > > pretty new program).
> >
> > "evolution sucks at gpg" - Douglas Calvert, GPG FAQ maintainer, 4/22/02
> >
> > evolution's handling of encryption has been broken for a long time. I've
> > seen numerous cases where it said a valid signature was invalid, and most
> > recently I saw it send an encrypted email (to me) broken enough that I
> > could not open it.
>
> Maybe you should send it to Jeff Stedfast, the Evo PGP code maintainer.
>
> >
> > --
> > "It's never too late to panic."
> > http://www.ChaosReigns.com
> --
>
> PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
> PGP public key:
> <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg>
>
> Conform or be cast out.
>
______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|