Noah Silva on Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:16:36 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Pascal?


> > I would like to see more advanced [compiled] languages thrive, but there
> > needs to be an easy to pick what you want to use, and that means that we
> > need to have libraries that can easily inter-operate, and ways to use
> > existing bindings.  This to me, is the positive effect that including C
> > in C++ had.  This was why I said it would be interesting to have a
> > pascal compiler that would let me declare C procedures and/or data
> > types.
> 
> If you want to do this very thing from ObjectPascal, why do you seem to make 
> it out to be such a bad thing that it can be done from C++?

Note that, however, I would not want to mix C and pascal (or any two
languages) in the same block of code.

> 
> >
> >  -- noah silva
> >
> >
> 



______________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group       -      http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  -  http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug