Noah Silva on Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:16:36 -0400 |
> > I would like to see more advanced [compiled] languages thrive, but there > > needs to be an easy to pick what you want to use, and that means that we > > need to have libraries that can easily inter-operate, and ways to use > > existing bindings. This to me, is the positive effect that including C > > in C++ had. This was why I said it would be interesting to have a > > pascal compiler that would let me declare C procedures and/or data > > types. > > If you want to do this very thing from ObjectPascal, why do you seem to make > it out to be such a bad thing that it can be done from C++? Note that, however, I would not want to mix C and pascal (or any two languages) in the same block of code. > > > > > -- noah silva > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|