Kevin Brosius on Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:42:47 -0400 |
Hmm, that machine is down (well, in Windows) at the moment, so I can't access it remote. I can check tonight... I think the kernel had Sony APIC or power management support in it's options. It was a SuSE kernel, as I recall, so might have included part/all of the patches you mention. I'll take a look. Kevin "W. Chris Shank" wrote: > > i'll have to check for .rej files tonight. > > the patches were for R505DL, mine is R505TS, so there is some differences. > But I thought the differences were mostly just cpu, hdd size, and onboard > wireless. > > do remember which kernel option locks up your vaio? > > > Good there're no rejects. Did you search through the log, or check for > > .rej files to be sure? > > > > Also, some of the SONY support appears to only work on some Vaio's, > > from what I've seen (at least one of the kernel options I tried locks a > > vaio solid.) It might be that kind of problem. Does this patch list > > which Vaio models it supports? > > > > Kev > > > > "W. Chris Shank" wrote: > >> > >> I'm using grub. i copied the grub entry from stock RH7.3, renamed it > >> and modified it so that all references to 2.4.18-3 (initrd and > >> vmlinuz) point to 2.4.18 instead. I left the original entry so that i > >> can boot stock RH7.3 too. > >> > >> it starts to boot. it just dies partway through. > >> > >> no rejects in patching. it was a bulk patch that someone made for vaio > >> laptop. so i need to decompose it in order to apply individually. > >> > >> > >> > >> > You busted it! :) > >> > > >> > Are you using lilo? Did you run it at the end? > >> > > >> > Do you _really_need_ a init_rd? If so, did you modify lilo to point > >> > to both the new kernel and new init_rd image? (If you have a > >> > separate kernel modules tree, such as a different version, for your > >> > previous kernel, then yes, you can put entries for both in the boot > >> > loader and just boot the previous kernel when the new one fails. > >> > Highly > >> > recommended.) > >> > > >> > How about the patching process, did you have any rejects? > >> > > >> > Kevin > >> > > >> > "W. Chris Shank" wrote: > >> >> > >> >> just to make sure i'm doing this right - this is my kernel > >> >> building/deploying procedure: > >> >> > >> >> make xconfig > >> >> make dep; make clean; make bzIamge; make modules; make > >> >> modules_install mv /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage > >> >> /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18 mv /usr/src/linux/System.map > >> >> /boot/System-map-2.4.18 > >> >> mv /usr/src/linux/vmlinux /boot/vmlinux-2.4.18 > >> >> mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.4.18.img 2.4.18 > >> >> (currently /boot/System.map is a soft-link to System.map-2.4.18-3 > >> >> (redhat 7.3 stock and /boot/vmlinuz is a soft-link to > >> >> vmlinuz-2.4.18-3 --> do i need to relink htese to my new ones? wha > >> >> if it doesn't work, will i be able to boot my old kernel?) > >> >> there is also /boot/module-info-2.4.18-3, i don't know how ot make > >> >> an equivalent of this with my new kernel. > >> >> > >> >> thanks for your help > >> >> > >> >> Sean Finney wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:21:22AM -0500, Sean Finney wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >>i'd suggest reconfiguring and re-compiling your kernel with > >> >> >>kernel debugging cranked all the way up to see if you can find > >> >> >>where the error is during the boot process. alternatively, you > >> >> >>could also try > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >oh, i forgot--i think you can use your System.map file to map the > >> >> >eip to where in the kernel you got that error as well. if that's > >> >> >the case you could probably figure out which patch was causing > >> >> >the error if the culprit were a patch > >> >> > > >> >> >--sean > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|