| Stephen Gran on Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:38:09 -0500 |
|
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 01:58:43PM -0500, Mike Leone said: > Stephen Gran (steve@lobefin.net) had this to say on 11/16/02 at 10:44: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:44:00PM -0500, Michael Leone said: > > > So what do we make of this: > > > > <snip apt segfaulting> > > > > You've been bitten by a bad c++ library in unstable. The temporary fix > > is to make a symlink in /usr/lib. Sadly, I can't remeber which symlink > > is broken, but it's one of: > > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 > > libstdc++.so.3 > > (I think it's one of the first two) > > root@minas-aran:/usr/lib# ls -la libstdc* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 256240 2000-02-19 10:41 libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 270280 2000-07-07 06:01 libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 444022 2002-09-23 18:24 libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.a > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 288444 2002-09-23 18:24 libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2002-03-30 17:45 libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 -> libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 2002-03-31 00:16 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 -> libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2002-09-29 20:56 libstdc++-libc6.2-2.a.3 -> libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.a > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 2002-09-29 20:55 libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 -> libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2002-09-29 20:56 libstdc++.so.3 -> libstdc++.so.3.0.4 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 569404 2002-09-21 15:10 libstdc++.so.3.0.4 > > > If you look around in /usr/lib, you'll notice that one of these is > > missing, and there is instead a symlink of a similar name, but missing > > the '-'. Nice huh, total breakage of all c++ apps because of a typo in > > I'm not seeing that ... Am I just overlooking something? Hmmm . . . no, I'm not seeing the problem on your box. This is the thread I was referring to, it might be of some help: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200211/msg01041.html > > postinst. Once you recreate the proper symlink, upgrade. The fix is > > now in unstable. Don't however, upgrade bonobo-activation if you want > > GNOME to start )^: - yet another mysterious break, but this one sounds > > like it's not the maintainer, but an upstream problem. > > I don't use GNOME, so no big deal there, atho I do sometimes use some GNOME > programs, such as evolution. That shouldn't be a problem, unless evolution needs bonobo for session management (don't know - I use mutt). -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |Stephen Gran | Ogden's Law: The sooner you fall behind, | |steve@lobefin.net | the more time you have to catch up. | |http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attachment:
pgp1hb4sTIyfE.pgp
|
|