Fred K Ollinger on Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:05:10 -0500 |
> On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 04:48 PM, Fred K Ollinger wrote: > > However, the one thing that I hated about Jaguar is that I couldn't > > roll > > back to a stable state. There is no downgrade in OS X (if there is, > > please > > tell me and maybe I could fix this situation). In linux, I can keep as > > many kernels as possible so at least my old stuff will continue > > working. > > That changed in Jaguar (or maybe it was 10.1.5) there IS an un-install > feature on the install disk. It's in the pull-down, (along with a > terminal window for standalone repairs.) However, I can't tell you how > well it works, or what is required to make it work. It may only work if > you have done a "clean install" -- which effectively renames / and > creates a new one... but you need twice as much free space then. > > Usually, it is EXTREMELY painful to roll back ANY OS upgrade. Much > easier to reload the backup you made before the upgrade. If all you If you ran debian you could do: To downgrade all packages to stable, edit /etc/apt/preferences as follows: Package: * Pin: release a=stable Pin-Priority: 1001 and run "apt-get upgrade", which forces downgrade due to Pin-priority > 1000 It won't cost you $120 to find out that it won't work either. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-package.en.html Also, another cool thing is that since deps are worked out across upgrades, you could upgrade only a few packages. So I could have all the features of debian's equivalent of jaguar, but use older printer drivers that still "just work" for my printer. If I'm spending $120 for an apt-get dist-upgrade, I expect at least equivalent functionality. I got less. Fred Ollinger _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|