gabriel rosenkoetter on Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:41:08 -0500 |
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:57:39PM -0500, Paul wrote: > And you wouldn't have conveniently lost your keys? And be brought up for perjury and contempt of court too? No, thanks; not when I can turn state's witness and get a lesser term for handing over my key. (In point of fact, if I were actually doing anything that needed to be hidden from the federal government by way of encryption, I'd be putting some failsafes in, using distributed, off-shore datawarehousing, and killswitches that activated at the first sign of tampering, so that there wouldn't BE any way to subpoena the data.) > That reminds me of the decision to not respond to "unconfirmed" burglar > alarms, unless they belong to a government official. Makes sense. How > else could you get government officials to take protection away from > their neighbors? I'm serious. I heard this on the news the other day. Oh well, that's almost as reliable as reading it on the Internet. ;^> -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpTMyd7UwEqR.pgp
|
|