gabriel rosenkoetter on Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:38:06 -0500 |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:07:06AM -0500, Paul wrote: > Nothing. I just thought you were saying that "stat" itself wasn't > portable. (I guess I haven't been reading carefully in the past day or so.) Nobody's stat(1) interface is portable, as near as I can tell. Everybody's stat(2) interface had better be, because it *is* part of the standards. -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgp5nq0zF1kCS.pgp
|
|