epike on Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:34:06 -0400 |
> Back to the thread: As Tom said I am still trying to get it to work locally. > Based on all your input I am thinking it's a permissions problem as I just > chose to have BIND installed in the Red Hat OS installation, and then later, > as root, ftp'ed all the named files in place. Part of the reason I did this > (other parts being newbie ignorance) was that I hosed the some of the keys > up with "rndc-confgen -a" along the way. Didn't know about the user "named" > either. > > -- > - Zake well, the bind book mentions the fact that if you dont put a "file" clause in the slave zone that it wont write to the filesystem--it shoudl keep the zone info cache in memory, so that could be another option for testing. never tried that myself though. (the downside being that if the primary is unavailable when slave named boots up it would have no server to load from) e pike _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|