William H. Magill on 1 Mar 2004 15:40:03 -0000 |
On 01 Mar, 2004, at 08:08, George Langford, Sc.D. wrote: In the context of whether Linux is ready for the desktop, yesterday I received notice from my Symantec NAV S/W running on a PC under W98SE that there was a virus in the PLUG Digest Vol. 1 #1106.. Even though Linux is relatively immune to virus attacks, Linux users appear to be lulled into a false sense of security that leaves their emails vulnerable to infections.
But I digress... The important point, which you hint at but fail to expand on... TODAY, Linux is not a "target" of virus writers. One reason is because Linux is not perceived as being the "evil empire." (I loved the way SCO tried to enhance its own ego by claiming that it too was as important as Microsoft so as to become a target of virus writers.) While people don't like to admit it, both Linux and Mac OS X, enjoy CONSIDERABLE "security by obscurity." It is not so much that any Unix environment is inherently "more secure," but rather, there are far fewer resources around devoted to attacking Unix based systems. (Remember, ALL forms of non-Microsoft operating systems represent only 10 or 12% of the desktops worldwide.) "Obviously," if/when Linux succeeds on the desktop, that will change. Then virus writers will turn their efforts towards devising Unix oriented virus programs -- "because they're there." T.T.F.N. William H. Magill # Beige G3 - Rev A motherboard - 768 Meg # Flat-panel iMac (2.1) 800MHz - Super Drive - 768 Meg # PWS433a [Alpha 21164 Rev 7.2 (EV56)- 64 Meg]- Tru64 5.1a # XP1000 - [Alpha EV6] magill@mcgillsociety.org magill@acm.org magill@mac.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|