sean finney on 1 Apr 2004 13:10:03 -0000 |
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:26:56AM -0500, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > > ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > It certainly isn't when you told us that the message was text/plain. > That's PRECISELY my point. It's YOUR responsibility to state the > terminal type necessary for display of your message (and you can't > go mixing them, as you did). the message shows up fine in mutt with krxvt (even with LANG=en_US), but i can see why it wouldn't in others, especially without the content-type charset specified and stuck to. > You needed to base64 that whole thing before handing it off to > GnuPG, as well. why's that? my copy reads a valid signature. sean Attachment:
signature.asc
|
|