Eug on 15 Jul 2004 21:11:02 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] DSL w/o local phone


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Russell Nordquist wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:41, Ed Martin wrote:
>> Want my opinion... The all corporate snakes you just have to
>> figure out which one is worse. I've been with comcast due to the
>> least amount of tecnical support I need. Plus a public IP address.
>> (important if you  want to do any type of hosting.
>
> i agree on the snakes part.

Touche'...

> i am looking at some of the smaller dsl companies for better
> customer service. i've been calling dsl providers and so far they
> have all
> answered quickly except verizon who estimated 30min wait time. now
> to figure out if one of the many dsl modems i have from failed
> ISP's will work as a normal bridge or if they are all made ISP
> specific.

I know I say this every time DSL talk comes up, but... My 'prefered'
corporate snake is Cavalier Telephone which covers local, long
distance and DSL for ~80 dollars (plus taxes... $95).

Granted, it does't answer the question about DSL without phone
service, but I have had no issues with phone or DSL in 18 months of
service EXCEPT the Verizon provisioning.


Eugene

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQPbykOkD7QKn7f0vEQLi5QCfWRcNAkcdlE712g2hgU+bg5vjUfwAoONH
L10iLu/ZorxHN4IeiLqVYELa
=kxzR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature