Michael C. Toren on 18 Apr 2005 14:54:30 -0000 |
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:44:45PM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > Mutt will verify the PGP key if I type escape-P. But I don't understand > why. Is there a good reason for people to do this, or should I politely > suggest they use PGP/Mime instead? I also don't see how to get mutt to > auto-validate such messages the way it does for PGP/Mime. The PGP-Notes.txt[1] file distributed with mutt suggests using the following procmail recipe to convert inline PGP data to PGP/Mime: :0 * !^Content-Type: message/ * !^Content-Type: multipart/ * !^Content-Type: application/pgp { :0 fBw * ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- * ^-----END PGP MESSAGE----- | formail \ -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt" :0 fBw * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- * ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | formail \ -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign" } Although personally, I would rather hit Meta-P to check an individual inline message rather than trying to muck with MIME-types automatically. -mct [1] PGP-Notes.txt can be found at <http://www.mutt.org/doc/PGP-Notes.txt>, or on a Debian system at <file:///usr/share/doc/mutt/PGP-Notes.txt.gz>. -- perl -e'$u="\4\5\6";sub H{8*($_[1]%79)+($_[0]%8)}sub G{vec$u,H(@_),1}sub S{vec ($n,H(@_),1)=$_[2]}$_=q^{P`clear`;for$iX){PG($iY)?"O":" "forX8);P"\n"}for$iX){ forX8){$c=scalar grep{G@$_}[$i-1Y-1Z-1YZ-1Y+1ZY-1ZY+1Z+1Y-1Z+1YZ+1Y+1];S$iY,G( $iY)?$c=~/[23]/?1:0:$c==3?1:0}}$u=$n;select$M,$C,$T,.2;redo}^;s/Z/],[\$i/g;s/Y /,\$_/xg;s/X/(0..7/g;s/P/print+/g;eval' # Michael C. Toren <mct@toren.net> ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|