Gabriel Farrell on 26 Oct 2006 15:40:29 -0000 |
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:35:08PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:30:45AM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson said: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:58:22PM -0400, Michael C. Toren wrote: > > > [15 lines, 96 words, 834 characters] Top characters: _ntiaosl > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:30:48PM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > > > > My understanding is that ftp.debian.org will hit round-robin DNS > > > > and so go somewhere in a reasonably load-balanced way. > > > > > > It looks like ftp.debian.org only returns one IP address, actually, > > > rather than using round-robin DNS. I'm using ftp.us.debian.org in > > > my sources.list, which *does* in fact use round-robin DNS. Maybe > > > give that a try? Failing that, another option may be to migrate > > > away from ftp and to start using http://http.us.debian.org instead. > > > > Switching to ftp.us.debian.org helped some, but migrating to http > > in addition solved the problem. Thanks. > > > > But why would ftp vs http matter? > > The machine is probably heavily loaded, and it's limit for concurrent > ftp sessions is lower than it's limit for concurrent http sessions. Or > not. Just a guess. Just for fun I did a little experimenting with ping and found that with an http connection (http:// at the front) http.us.debian.org and ftp.us.debian.org both appear to point at the same round-robin DNS. As noted above, http://ftp.debian.org is not round-robin (for me, it points to debian-mirror.mirror.umn.edu). gabe ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|