Gabriel Farrell on 23 Feb 2007 15:08:08 -0000 |
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:04:32PM -0500, Doug Crompton wrote: > I thought when they broke up the phone companies this was suppose to work > like out electric power does not - you pay for a generation supplier > (selectable) and a distribution supplier (always PECO). This would be > analogous to having Verizon supply a pipe to the internet provider of your > choice. That is the way it should be. > > Sounds like a good class action suit. Where are the lawyers? > > Doug > The reason for this difference, and the difference between phone service and cable (and FIOS, I believe) can be found in the Supreme Court ruling in NCTA v. Brand X. It's a good read [1], and I think had more of an effect on network neutrality than anything called by that name. I found myself in agreement with Scalia -- something I thought would never happen. Gabe [1] See the Brand X portion of http://www.freepress.net/content/grokster_brandx ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|