Re: [PLUG] Evolution vs. Thunderbird

["Louis Kratz" <louis.kratz@gmail.com>]

I've used both, and found thunderbird is much better for mail.  I
found evolution to be a tad unstable, and quite bloated when it comes
to memory usage.  The calendar and PDA syncing was nice, but for just
mail thunderbird is quick, stable, and easier to use.

On 2/27/07, Alex Launi <socialrevolutionary@comcast.net> wrote:
> The age old battle rages on. I recently stopped dual booting with
> windows since I got crossover office to run my games close to as well as
> windows. I was using thunderbird for interoperability between the two
> but since ditching windows I've started using evolution for its gnome
> integration. So far thunderbird is winning as far as functionality,
> speed, and ease of use but gnome integration is a major plus for
> evolution. I haven't been able to configure evolution to send to a
> secondary SMTP server, it only wants to send to my default which is no
> good. Has anyone else had this problem? Thunderbird did it with no
> problem. Thoughts of the Philly community?
> -Alex Launi
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug