[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Verizon FIOS & open wireless
|
- From: "Brent Saner" <brent.saner@gmail.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] Verizon FIOS & open wireless
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:58:45 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=ChWLolxYE9sTDF+EYyK62sg1Nq1mhTcIBpqp14uSSf0=; b=ON8zdk1+yFeARf7cMqd0QAnVp9BXi2nOcyNVcgpwNF23EpQ5V6peA+E+KArs4C+uHDUjFHrtiXo2vLJKBu4lu/vKymGxNvrvPbpL/JyEsxsOqyOJs8Q19bMB51VeXiwhRWHF9b9By/3GeeBXQEhr40thaiSopSv1rIUDyITRc6c=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
well, that's always the preference, i think- when able, always delegate specialized hardware.
of course, there are downsides- more hardware to maintain, cost, different possibilities of bugs/security risks ("a chain is only as strong as its weakest link"), etc.
On 10/2/07, zuzu <sean.zuzu@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/2/07, Brent Saner <brent.saner@gmail.com> wrote: > BRILLIANT! > > you have slain the Beast of Insecure Open AP. you get B00ts of 1337n3ss, 14 > gold, 3 silver, and 15 pounds of tasty meat.
I love the _idea_ of VPNs but have found them to be a bear to implement in practice. I'd like to be able to roll out IPsec, but the closest I've come is using OpenVPN, and 90% of the time I'm lazy and
rely on SSH tunnels (which I think is how OpenVPN works anyway). anyone out there have mad IPsec (or general VPN) skills who can share some "best practices" from experience?
p.s. DD-WRT can do everything else described. it'll even host an
OpenVPN server with the "-vpn" branch of the distribution, although that's a bit too many eggs in one basket for my taste. I'd prefer a beefier dedicated/separate device for that.
> On 10/2/07, Matthew Rosewarne <
mrosewarne@inoutbox.com> wrote: > > > > While the idea of an open-but-secure access point is long overdue, very > few > > people have actually bothered to implement them. It's much easier to
> grasp > > the quaint old notion of the strong perimeter defence, even though this > goal > > is proving more and more untenable. An open-but-secure network is > certainly > > possible, but requires some work to set up. I can guarantee you that
> there's > > no firmware on any consumer-grade AP that can do it, so you would need to > use > > a custom firmware. Here's how I would go about it: > > > > 1. Since WEP is worthless, don't bother with it.
> > 2. The wireless network is to be treated as a DMZ or external/untrusted > zone, > > just like the internet. > > 3. To get out of the DMZ and into the internal/trusted network, you use a
> > cryptographically-sound VPN, such as an IPSec tunnel. Filtering MAC > > addresses is in no way to be considered "security". > > 4. Set up QoS so that any traffic in or out of the internal network has
> > absolute priority over traffic from the DMZ, so people can't hog your > > connection. Rate limiting is not particularly helpful, since DMZ traffic > can > > still hold up "trusted" traffic.
> > 5. Any other restrictions on DMZ traffic are up to you. > > > > There is another issue, not technical, but legal, that might warrant some > > attention. In your contract with your ISP, you probably explicitly agreed
> > not to provide an open access point. While it's unlikely they'll do > anything > > about it, they might decide to cut off your access. > > > > %!PS: If it has the horsepower, trying using your AP as a Tor node.
> > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- > http://www.phillylinux.org
> > Announcements - > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > > General Discussion -- >
http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > > > > > > > > -- > Brent Saner > 215.264.0112 (cell) > 215.362.7696(residence) > >
http://www.thenotebookarmy.org > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Philadelphia Linux Users Group --
http://www.phillylinux.org > Announcements - > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce > General Discussion --
> http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > ___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
-- Brent Saner 215.264.0112
(cell) 215.362.7696(residence)
http://www.thenotebookarmy.org
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|