zuzu on 3 Oct 2007 03:04:34 -0000 |
On 10/2/07, gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net> wrote: > I'm in the process of responding to a heap of messages in a thread > here right now. > > I'm not going to get into the politics of top replies and so forth, > not just because it's just too religious to touch, but because I'm a > culprit at this point. I've given in, at work, to Outlook and, > away-but-at home, to the iPhone Mail.app (a simple Applescript > binding makes it easy to respond Properly in the regular Mac OS X > Mail.app, so not there, and obviously never in my preferred MUA, > mutt(1)). > > So, I don't plan to shriek at anyone over top-replies here, even > though I still believe that they are inconsiderate of one's > correspondents and readers... but even when your MUA makes it > painful to avoid top-replies, it's still possible, in a sustained > conversation, to trim the tailings. I just did 30dd in vi(1), and, > in doing so, removed four duplications of the same mailing-list- > added footers. > > Pretty please with a berry of your choice on top: show a little > respect for your correspondents. I try my best to reply Properly; my will was forged in the pits of USENET. I've even been chastised by the "AOLers" for *not* replying at the top (as early as 1999!). though I've mellowed (in an cask of "new media theory") to understand that we have different cultures from different waves of immigrants here into cyberspace. (I think I've personally witnessed at least 5 generations of cultures pass through the slashdot commentarium. I've had people correct me that "0wn" should be spelled "pwn". et ceteras.) tracing the lineages and mapping the boundaries of such subcultures is a job for someone like danah boyd, but I'd probably read her weblog post about it. however, I do wax nostalgic for the heady days when the WELL and financial cryptography was the calm eye at the center of the memetic maelstrom of the internet. I would never have bet on Larry Lessig being correct with what he wrote in 'Code' when it was first published. I figured copyright would have been declared dead while we all use DigiCash instead of PayPal (or even Federal Reserve Notes) and our personal smart agents help us tidy up our distributedly-hosted Wikipedia/everything2 by now. also we'd be wearing lightweight goggles, like sony's glasstron improved, rather than continuing to read off of screens. I still expect alot more "Snow Crash" and alot less "Clash of the Civilizations" from this world. oh yeah, and wasn't "dark fibre" supposed to create virtually limitless bandwidth and completely transform the economics of online activity? instead I have to hear FUD about the "exabyte flood" and "net neutrality". in conclusion, "Web 2.0" kinda sucks. </rant> ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|