zuzu on 10 Oct 2007 19:28:24 -0000 |
On 10/10/07, gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net> wrote: > At 2007-10-10 04:37 -0400, zuzu <sean.zuzu@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think the official Apple specifications are the issue so much > > as the lack of available 4GB SO-DIMMs. I'd give at least 50/50 odds > > that the Santa Rosa MacBook Pro can address more than 4GB (as it is a > > truly 64-bit system, unlike previously when the C2D was dropped inside > > a Core Duo intended motherboard -- compatible but unaware of the > > 64-bit addressing instructions of the Core 2 Duo). > > You're entitled to your opinion, and when you show me the white > papers with the supporting evidence that SO-DIMMs that large fit > within the power and space constraints of the MacBook, I will agree > with you. the foremost constraint is a lack of 4GB SO-DIMMs with which to test. I'll take empirical results over white papers anyday. > > try Firefox -- especially Firefox rather than Camino -- with 200+ tabs, > > I was presenting an example. I've no interest in a size comparison. > > It does sound like your memory needs are rather great, but I do not > think that they are those of the average user, even a power user. again, I'd like to see hard data on this phenomenon. I suspect I'm not as rare as you and a few others have implied. > > ok, thought so. I was being too lazy to google. > > Aha. It's good that you admit it. sure, you "caught" me. good job. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|