Brian Stempin on 18 Oct 2007 03:51:12 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] cultural ethics of email and spam

  • From: "Brian Stempin" <brian.stempin@gmail.com>
  • To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
  • Subject: Re: [PLUG] cultural ethics of email and spam
  • Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:50:59 -0400
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=XLsPYCdeOytRsyPX8A5/GM3ZhYChcepMrKHeZnAJDNk=; b=D0Q9KBJfu2qjYllBXpDpv+vOkxa0b2uSmm8JM39GOdoJA0pwSF6LDLU+kIpQzVmksvJO2beSUbQDmkTeVmwfC+CZXL1QsDgZmbuEo8rpMaIqRkfCF7piaNU6eUuV7+ZheyfFjjAZUgdsHDyFMu3paD30zG6Al82dOQNWUMudt7U=
  • Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
  • Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org

<cross posting seems appropriate here>

a pretty serious issue?  really?  half-joking, are your internets
getting stuck in your tubes because of all the Chinese emails?

admittedly, I'm not a full-time mailserver admin, but I've asked the
question before, why it's worth more of your time (or hiring someone)
to sort categorize spam from other email rather than just throwing
more bandwidth at the problem?

maybe this is how shanghai and the rest of the world (who have
affordable fibre optic internet upstreams) prefer to deal with spam --
just ignore it.  and the only reason USA residents get a bee in their
bonnet is because they don't have bandwidth parity?


Yeah, I'll ignore it when it subsides.  In today's environment, most companies that run email servers either have to (a) buy more or larger mail servers, (b) install some sort of spam appliance (sonicwall, dedicated SpamAssassin box, etc), or (c) both -- all just to keep up with spam!  More bandwidth does not solve these issues.  Granting more bandwidth to mail servers does not reduce the computational cost of processing and delivering all of that mail.  Furthermore, spam filters are often times cheaper than a server, easier to administer, and they can filter spam for multiple servers or even an entire cluster.  Guess which route most travel?

In regards to the part where you state that the rest of the world prefers to deal with spam by ignoring it:  so does the US.  They're called spam filters and blacklists, and they can be found at many ISPs and private email servers the US and world 'round.  In fact, some people are even willing to pay to have this done for them.

I don't know why it is that you so fervently advocate that bandwidth will solve the issue at hand, but I can say this:  You seem to have taken nothing into account except for bandwidth.



___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug