Aaron Mulder on 26 Oct 2007 01:46:12 -0000 |
On 10/25/07, Stephen Gran <steve@lobefin.net> wrote: > ... > I hope I'm not alone in > my feeling that if we just keep on making our corner of the Universe a > little better, the closed software houses will fade into irrelevancy. Sadly, the success of this approach seems to be very irregular. For example, I like a lot of things about KDE as a desktop. But I gave up and bought a Mac because of neverending problems with suspend to RAM and wireless. Part of the problem is that I like new hardware, and there's a long lag between release and acceptable Linux support. Another part of the problem (and perhaps the root of that previous one) is that hardware vendors often aren't on board. It's gratifying to see Nvidia and ATI getting more involved with solid and/or open source drivers, and again, my X experience was fine. But I need to be able to close my laptop in one place, open it in another, and have the networking work (and no freezes on suspend or resume). Why is that so hard to achieve? I guess because the small number of driver developers can't cover the vast array of devices. It makes Apple seem really smart for picking a small number of configurations and making them work really well. (But not as small and/or unimpressive a selection as Dell and Lenovo offer.) Anyway, bottom line, I think it's the hardware vendors that prevent the Linux corner of the Universe from edging out closed software houses, and that's a real bummer. The software is by and large great. Thanks, Aaron ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|