Toby DiPasquale on 26 Oct 2007 10:26:24 -0000 |
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 09:54:20AM -0400, Toby DiPasquale said: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:40:12PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 07:26:30AM -0400, Toby DiPasquale said: > > > > > > Also, if Free Software cares so much about copyright, then its > > > > proponents can't really get upset when others enforce their own > > > > copyrights, as the GPL-bangers are just dying to get the chance to do > > > > one day. > > > > > > I must be misunderstanding you. You think that disliking copyrights > > > that restrict access to source code means that you can't be upset when > > > those same copyrights are enforced? Does that make any sense? > > > > I think that if you like copyrights to enforce your agenda, you can't get > > pissed when someone else uses copyrights to enforce theirs. > > OK, well, if you really think the GPL is the same as the RIAA or MS, I > can't be bothered to be interested enough to argue. Have fun with that. If only that were what I said... -- Toby DiPasquale ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|