fljohnson3 on 28 Oct 2007 10:44:45 -0000 |
To the rookie observer, a thimbleful of the commentary on Comcast in the last year sounds like the work of ppl trying to run Internet servers in their homes. AFAIK, the "consumer" broadband services won't, as a matter of policy, let you do that. The asymmetrical bandwidth thing also makes it impractical. That said, do I have it correct that any and all attempts to put Internet servers (SMTP/HTTP/FTP/friends) are doing so on Comcast's Business broadband-and getting jerked around by Comcast's network admins/marketing people in the process? I was able to glean from the archives issues of : (1) undertrained customer support (they never really learned what IP is, outside of two or three applications that came in the box with Windoze) (2) a less-than-optimally-reliable WAN (3) poor network management practices, e.g. making it harder for the user to get stuff done or presenting how it all works as a "black art" that the user shouldn't "worry (his/her) pretty little head about". (I used to do net admin for a small company in DC, and insisted on educating MY users.) Had I sufficient capital, know-how (my WAN knowledge tops out with the T-1), and charisma, I'd say we band together and build a broadband ISP to kick Comcast where it hurts. ----------------------------------------- Join ISP.COM today - $9.95 internet , less than 1/2 the cost of AOL Try us out, http://www.isp.com/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|