K.S. Bhaskar on 6 Nov 2007 02:39:29 -0000 |
On Nov 5, 2007 2:28 PM, Matthew Rosewarne <mrosewarne@inoutbox.com> wrote: > On Monday 05 November 2007, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > > [KSB] QEMU works as an emulator. But the kernel module works about 5% > > of the time (optimistic estimate) and rest of the time it just hangs, > > or my virtual machine goes into an endless boot cycle. So I have my > > choice of slow and reliable, or faster and very flaky. I tried kvm, > > and it doesn't seem to be any better than the QEMU kernel module. So. > > I'm stuck with VMWare for now. > > That's unfortunate. I'm guessing those problems must be either redhat or > hardware related, since I've never had anything but success running it on > Debian. Can't speak for KVM though, as I don't have any desktops with VT. [KSB2} Au contraire, I run Kubuntu and occasionally Debian Sid, and not Red Hat or Fedora. QEMU runs well. The kernel accelerator doesn't. My CPU doesn't have VT - I tried KVM on a colleague's laptop with an AMD dual core CPU with VT. So I resort to VMware-workstation as the least bad way to run Win XP on those rare occasions when I must. -- Bhaskar ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|