|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- From: "David Kuntz" <davkntz@gmail.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] LVM Question
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:21:41 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jL1b0ELXxhVhZ5fQ75CIRJP/fMDlW46n7vegS0oJrOk=; b=ApWnqvLoEjqUH2Y1turmnDcH1/kjvCXrbQpdZVs1kNIQ08qBRmONFIi0ASAiaP9u2Yu6/nieUsvj1IzE17vEzrU42Gk5eP5vJQSRFVj/Ua3k7R8c8jBj3iardmgbjOOR6YMi+RNOuIq5X0r6P36+hO+Xs7eWfWCeXdXl4OCbztA=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
pvdisplay /dev/sdx
On Nov 19, 2007 4:25 PM, Neill R <nrdevelopment@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any way to verify the exact pvid on a certain LUN?
>
> Just curious....
> Thanks
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2007 12:20 PM, Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com> wrote:
> > you should be ok. LVM (Linux/AIX/Vertias), will create a PVID (Physical
> > Volume ID) on each disk under LVMs control. The device name is irreverent,
> > by the PVID is extremely useful..
> >
> > Goodluck
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 19, 2007 5:52 AM, Neill R <neill@nsyd.com> wrote:
> > > thanks guys, that was the answer I was hoping for.
> > >
> > > have a great week!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 19, 2007 8:20 AM, James Barrett <jadoba@jadoba.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 08:00:11AM -0500, Neill R wrote:
> > > > > I am concerned that when i reboot the machine my lvm volume groups
> > > > > will get all out of whack since the /dev/sd? devices will be shuffeled
> > > > > around. Is this a real issue or is LVM have a mechanism to handle a
> > > > > situation like this.
> > > >
> > > > If I am not mistaken, LVM identifies physical disks by their UUID, so
> > > > shuffling block devices should really not be an issue. If I am wrong,
> > > > someone probably will correct me, so dont try it if someone does :)
> > > >
> > > > -- James
> > > >
> > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> > > >
> > > > iD8DBQFHQY2x1OcdbM8NFsgRAoiqAJ9jUcFbQQ2PMIdYfkzk4FjIuvJPIgCeKVG0
> > > > Rruhc1Ln1TG0JA/4sYr96J4=
> > > > =4z9O
> > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >
> > > >
> > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Philadelphia Linux Users Group --
> > http://www.phillylinux.org
> > > > Announcements -
> > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> > > > General Discussion --
> > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > > Philadelphia Linux Users Group --
> > http://www.phillylinux.org
> > > Announcements -
> > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> > > General Discussion --
> > http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > >
> >
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|