Art Alexion on 19 Jan 2008 09:05:19 -0800 |
On Friday 18 January 2008 21:12:56 Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > > I am further advised that KDE dropped Konqueror in favor of Dolphin. > > Here I am, just getting used to what Konqueror can accomplish, and POOF, > > the design team has `helped me out' in the form of introducing a new and > > improved Dolphin. When I tried Dolphin, a while back, it was small and > > unobtrusive. It has three panes in KDE3.x, two of which I don't need. > > Nobody's dropped Konqueror. If you don't like Dolphin, use Konqueror > instead. I could search my high-volume kubuntu-users folder for links if you need them, but my understanding is that konqueror-kde4 is a web browser only. If you use it for file management, you are really only using an embedded dolphin.part. Konqueror 3.x is IMO the best reason to use KDE. A mid-quality web browser, but a fantastic file manager and other cool stuff (like fonts:// smb:// audiocd://, etc.). Dolphin uses more screen space than the crippled tasks it performs warrant. I am truly puzzled as to why it is considered an improvement. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|