Greg Sabino Mullane on 20 Jan 2008 12:56:35 -0800 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > We're having an issue with some code we picked up that's tied to > PostgresSQL. This code currently does not run any kind of replication > for its Postgres instance which we find to be unacceptable for what > would seem to be obvious reasons. The kind of replication we'd like to > do is master-slave asynchronous replication, which is quite simple > using MySQL as replication is built in. We've investigated some of the > options for Postgres replication (in particular Slony, but most others > are pretty old) but the best we can come up with so far is > master-slave *synchronous* backup. We'd rather not have to stop the > master while we are backing up to the slave if possible. Slony is asynchronous, and used in many production environments. There's also Bucardo, which does asynchronous master-slave and master-master, but is very new. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200801201553 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFHk7UpvJuQZxSWSsgRA8JWAJ9jl1WnR+0shYtJKv3r4v7L4ud85gCg3WWx IrLnk6HybqkwJtMq406l/XQ= =cXm6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|