Matthew Rosewarne on 21 Jan 2008 09:43:52 -0800 |
On Monday 21 January 2008, Art Alexion wrote: > Not as I read. postings on dot.kde.org (including the link I sent) seem to > be saying that there weren't enough developers interested in the file > management side of konqueror, so they dropped it in favor of including the > dolphin kpart. Comments on the dot should probably be taken with a hefty dose of salt if you aren't sure who's an actual developer. The file management component of Konqueror has always been a kpart, now shared between Dolphin and Konqueror, so any improvements apply to both applications. > Understood. I just have some concerns about the direction as opposed to > the fit & finish. Well, to see what improvements 4.0 has over 3.5, you'd need to go source diving. Much of the user-visible side is not complete and will likely be quite different for 4.1. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|