Art Alexion on 21 Jan 2008 07:42:58 -0800 |
On Sunday 20 January 2008 15:44:12 Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > I've certainly used Nautilus and Dolphin, and I don't see them being very > similar at all. Again: Konqueror is still there, Dolphin is the default > not because of some proclamation from on high, but because there were many > users who voiced concerns over Konqueror's complexity. Not as I read. postings on dot.kde.org (including the link I sent) seem to be saying that there weren't enough developers interested in the file management side of konqueror, so they dropped it in favor of including the dolphin kpart. > The 4.0 is NOT ready for most users, keep that in mind. I myself will be > using 3.5.8 as my desktop until the 4.1 release, which will be able to > supplant 3.5. Understood. I just have some concerns about the direction as opposed to the fit & finish. Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|