Greg Helledy on 3 Mar 2008 08:55:49 -0800


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[PLUG] One True OS


I work in a small (15 employees) firm that's dependent on MS 
Windows/Office.  We do not have a full-time IT person--the guy who does 
our PC support is a programmer and has his own work to do.  We are on XP 
and don't use domains.

Recently we've had a lot of windows-related issues, some related to 
viruses and some not.  This has caused the programmer a lot of stress 
and the company some inconvenience.

I have played around with VMware player a tiny bit (I have a Debian Etch 
image here on my work PC) and it occurred to me that if we could run MS 
Office on XP in a VMware image, with a linux host OS we might be able to 
increase reliability.  I would probably pick the LTS Kubuntu 
distribution for ease of support.

My questions are:
*Would we be able to get away with the free VMware player if the VMware 
tools are installed?
*Can things be configured in such a way that sharing files between 
computers works as it does now, so that the controller and payroll 
person can pass excel files back and forth?
*Are there any other things that are going to be significant obstacles 
to office work that I'm not thinking of?

Thanks,
Greg
--------------------------



* From: JP Vossen <jp@jpsdomain.org>

My very small scale solution to all of this is to run W2KPro in VMware
server under Ubuntu.  This works great since I get awesome and complete
cross-platform remote control (VMware fat console), hardware
independence for the picky Windows side (it's a VM), Linux power and
stability for the base platform (Ubuntu LTS), Windows "bare metal
restore" backups (i.e., copy the VM dir!:), and Windows "upgrade"
back-out protection (a VM snapshot).  I can't stress enough how happy I
am with this solution, but I only use it for a very small number of
nodes thus far (4) and I doubt it's scalable though I really haven't
given that much thought.


[...]
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:40:53 -0500
  > The need to do too many frequent upgrades has been one of my biggest
  > beefs with desktop Linux in commercial environments. Even with Ubuntu
  > - you really need to upgrade every 6 months, ...

That's what Ubuntu LTS releases are for.  While 3 years is a bit less
than the recent MS major release cycle <snicker>, it seems pretty good
to me.

My $0.02,
JP

-- 
Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible
for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
and notify GRA, Inc. (postmaster@gra-inc.com) immediately. Please advise
immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail
for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information
expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by GRA, Inc. unless
otherwise indicated by an authorized representative independent of this
message.

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug