Greg Helledy on 3 Mar 2008 08:55:49 -0800 |
I work in a small (15 employees) firm that's dependent on MS Windows/Office. We do not have a full-time IT person--the guy who does our PC support is a programmer and has his own work to do. We are on XP and don't use domains. Recently we've had a lot of windows-related issues, some related to viruses and some not. This has caused the programmer a lot of stress and the company some inconvenience. I have played around with VMware player a tiny bit (I have a Debian Etch image here on my work PC) and it occurred to me that if we could run MS Office on XP in a VMware image, with a linux host OS we might be able to increase reliability. I would probably pick the LTS Kubuntu distribution for ease of support. My questions are: *Would we be able to get away with the free VMware player if the VMware tools are installed? *Can things be configured in such a way that sharing files between computers works as it does now, so that the controller and payroll person can pass excel files back and forth? *Are there any other things that are going to be significant obstacles to office work that I'm not thinking of? Thanks, Greg -------------------------- * From: JP Vossen <jp@jpsdomain.org> My very small scale solution to all of this is to run W2KPro in VMware server under Ubuntu. This works great since I get awesome and complete cross-platform remote control (VMware fat console), hardware independence for the picky Windows side (it's a VM), Linux power and stability for the base platform (Ubuntu LTS), Windows "bare metal restore" backups (i.e., copy the VM dir!:), and Windows "upgrade" back-out protection (a VM snapshot). I can't stress enough how happy I am with this solution, but I only use it for a very small number of nodes thus far (4) and I doubt it's scalable though I really haven't given that much thought. [...] Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:40:53 -0500 > The need to do too many frequent upgrades has been one of my biggest > beefs with desktop Linux in commercial environments. Even with Ubuntu > - you really need to upgrade every 6 months, ... That's what Ubuntu LTS releases are for. While 3 years is a bit less than the recent MS major release cycle <snicker>, it seems pretty good to me. My $0.02, JP -- Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify GRA, Inc. (postmaster@gra-inc.com) immediately. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by GRA, Inc. unless otherwise indicated by an authorized representative independent of this message. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|