Stephen Gran on 8 Apr 2008 17:56:44 -0700 |
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:29:19PM -0400, George A. Theall said: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:33:08PM -0400, Casey Bralla wrote: > > > I can understand filter > > the eMail port, since this is an anti-spam action, but this is all starting to get > > old. > > I wonder if they're doing this to try to combat botnets that use Double > FastFlux, where machines can act not only as web servers hosting > malicious content but also DNS servers for the associated domains. Yes, I think so. It's a bit of a pain for people on comcast, but these days it may be the only responsible thing for an ISP to do. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | Madness has no purpose. Or reason. | | steve@lobefin.net | But it may have a goal. -- Spock, | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | "The Alternative Factor", stardate | | | 3088.7 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|