brent saner on 12 Jun 2008 05:53:19 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Michael Leone wrote: | | Why? What information is it sending? It seems you are saying is | that *what* they sent back, was worse than the fact that *anything* | was sent back. | | I have nothing to do with PBXes, so I have no real opinion, one way | or the other. | hardware configuration. what sort of ZAP card you might have, what processor, what protocols i think. but as i mentioned previously, they did it in such a way as that they essentially had root to your box. - -- brent saner. gpg info at http://www.notebookarmy.org/gpg.txt (this is a shorter sig.) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIURw28u2Zh4MtlQoRA8+iAJ0REbHnUv0z0a4r0AQT3Xkh7eM8FQCgq827 ZnN4a8c3lKksf0TpbcOYB5Y= =vq0t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|