| Stephen Gran on 26 Aug 2008 03:18:26 -0700 |
|
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:23:22AM -0400, Matthew Rosewarne said: > On Monday 25 August 2008, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Drawing it out makes it easier to visualize, for me at least: > > I tried the ASCII art route, but it got a bit tricky, so Kivio got the job. > > On Monday 25 August 2008, Chad Vogelsong wrote: > > The simple solution is keep one at 192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0 and make > > the other 192.168.2.1 / 255.255.255.0. Then on the left end point > > (1.1), you can say that 2.1 subnet goes to VPN tunnel. Just the > > opposite on the right host (2.1), where 1.1 subnet gets routed to VPN > > tunnel. > > Yeah, I was hoping I didn't have to do that. The WRV54G's manual seemed to > imply that both ends could be 192.168.1.1, but maybe that's just a Linksys > thing. Even if the linksys could somehow manage it, TCP/IP can't. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | Better to light one candle than to | | steve@lobefin.net | curse the darkness. -- motto of the | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | Christopher Society | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|