| Stephen Gran on 26 Aug 2008 03:24:26 -0700 |
|
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:25:00AM -0400, Matthew Rosewarne said: > On Tuesday 26 August 2008, some idiot wrote: > > I tried the ASCII art route, but it got a bit tricky, so Kivio got the job. > > It would have made sense to actually attach the result... That's not actually that complicated - you just want a net-to-net tunnel, it looks like. Sad but true, TCP/IP can not be taught to route traffic for two hosts with the same IP address differently depending on which one you mean at the moment. You'll need to do one of two things: change the subnet on one side of the tunnel, or use something like L2TP to have a single bridged subnet. If you choose the latter, you still need to renumber some machines, since TCP/IP still won't be able to decide which machine you mean and will likely always choose the local one. Once you've decided which way to go, the setup isn't that bad. I think I have some samples laying around that might be helpful for the openswan side of it, at least. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | Magnocartic, adj.: Any automobile | | steve@lobefin.net | that, when left unattended, attracts | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | shopping carts. -- Sniglets, "Rich | | | Hall & Friends" | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|