Eric on 22 Feb 2009 13:45:57 -0800 |
Casey Bralla wrote: > I'm planning a video card purcahse soon. I'd like to go with ATI due to their > better open source support (or at least, better open source noises). > > The last I heard, ATI closed source drivers were superior to the open source > ones. > > Anybody have any opinions on them? > I, too, had a similar dilemma a few months ago. I received a second 22" monitor for Christmas and could not get it to work in a dual-monitor configuration with the existing video card (which was a ATI Radeon chip in a "Diamond Stealth" card.) To be fair, I could get the dual monitors to work but only with the generic driver. If I wanted ANY acceleration at all I had to switch to the fglrx driver and that simply would not recognize the second monitor. ATI proprietary drivers failed outright because it was a radeon _chip_ but a Diamond Stealth _card_. I bit the bullet and went for a nVidia card and I've been very happy with it. ATI may have been a "better" choice for some reasons but the nVidia-based card is the best performing video card I've ever used. FYI: Between now and 3/1 there are several video cards on sale at MicroCenter in St. Davids. Prices from $30 to $135. Eric -- # Eric Lucas # # "Oh, I have slipped the surly bond of earth # And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings... # -- John Gillespie Magee Jr ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|