Art Alexion on 23 Mar 2010 02:58:38 -0700 |
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:19:12 Casey Bralla wrote: > I suppose there is some type of good reason you're virtualizing WinServer > inside VMWare instead of just letting it run under VirtualBox. (I can't > guess what that reason would be, but it seems too bizarre not to be well > thought out.) Not as bizarre as it sounds. The 2008 server is one of about 30 running on 4 esx servers that form my company's infrastructure. VirtualBox is the way that I run some windows-only admin tools on my Linux desktop. vSphere which is the admin client for the esx cluster is win-only (in spite of the fact that the esx host is Linux) The weird part about this, though is that my Rube Goldberg-esque setup works fine on all of the servers in the cluster except 2008R2. 2003-2008 work fine. -- Art Alexion Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|