Walt Mankowski on 17 Jul 2010 08:04:23 -0700 |
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 09:47:22AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote: > On a Mac OS X 10.5+ machines, I use TimeMachine which you can trick > into using an Ubuntu server as the remote backup. Otherwise an > attached external FireWire (USB works but is dog slow) is the way to > go. Prior to 10.5, I used CCC (aka Carbon Copy Cloner) which is the > equivalent of rsync that makes the backup disk bootable. While the transfer is slow, the actual process of deciding what needs to be backed up is fast because OSX tracks which files have been added or modified. (I assume this is a feature of HFS+, but a quick google didn't turn up anything.) What this typically means is that the first time you run Time Machine it takes hours, but the hourly incremental backups that run after that generally only take a minute or two. In contrast a backup of an ext3 partition has to recursively look through the entire partition each time it runs. I use rdiff-backup to backup about 50 gb to an external usb drive and it takes about 40 minutes to do an incremental backup. Walt Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|