Art Alexion on 4 Aug 2010 20:09:55 -0700

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] Digikam & Picasa, follow-up

  • From: Art Alexion <>
  • To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <>
  • Subject: Re: [PLUG] Digikam & Picasa, follow-up
  • Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:09:50 -0400
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gofvv2XQcdseMaonuNP+6ve/ZCQqhG2MDwZkZAZ0vJU=; b=lIT9AdP3nGs36Re2p1FAE33Td5eK5tgVLXtit8Aszhd3y7yxKwNsgL6390lXVMaNvX tZhydkwDX32Zik3AdAksWx7z5tHs88Nsz3FkXXbHDLgDu4fOho9fIOLVk3kcKWxG46hp jQpqusqn3MysmxI+gtmcD6+UsxOBMMp1MxVfc=
  • Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <>
  • Sender:

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:23 AM, JP Vossen <> wrote:
So I tried out Digikam, and it worked fine on *my* machine with local pics.  Then I tried it on my wife's laptop, and it was terrible.  But it turns out that this wasn't Digikam's fault, and Picasa had been suffering from a similar issue (which I think I didn't noticed until after my previous post).

I f my memory serves me, wasn't one of the original digikam developers on this list in the early 2000s?

sent unsigned from webmail interface
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --
Announcements -
General Discussion  --