[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] 10.04 install problems
|
- From: Bob Schwier <schwepes2002@yahoo.com>
- To: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] 10.04 install problems
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285517760; bh=CjCUNb1cPjhBGHdmfm5x46dLwb2VuneZ/+iJszkNb0E=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xI3IzgSSWOL4x3cgclnwhPEUn+oA58le9jERECV89+Ua7SJgLEqWBzG2JI+nnAqBf6UjxNywwvJBDmS/YAEW3k4vwam+UNGu/tEBumjVbUsKAfxCRih87vxXO1D+ea9akpgtL10jv1kXf3AIL+Eapc21y2sqbU4csm96rcnd33w=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
--- On Sat, 9/25/10, Jason Stelzer <jason.stelzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Jason Stelzer <jason.stelzer@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PLUG] 10.04 install problems > To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org> > Date: Saturday, September 25, 2010, 12:36 PM > You may want to check out the > following: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Bob Schwier <schwepes2002@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > dpkg --configure --all > > You want "dpkg --configure -a" > --all isn't valid. The man page has the details.
dpkg --configure -a got back a response that there was no -o switch. I had typed everything correctly and simple --configure got the same
response.
aptitude looks very interesting. Wish I knew more about it as it seems that what I need is somewhere in there.
> > > > Which usually fix things if the upgrade didn't > complete correctly. > > > > All that does is finish unpacking debs and execute pending > scripts. If > things are in a state where modules aren't being loaded, > then it may > not fix much of anything. But, it's going to at least get > the system > back into a state where apt-get can be used to install > additional > things. > > > > The printer has no work around like that. There is > no lp0 or > > lp anything in /dev and various commands offered on > the cups > > site simply don't do anything. > > Check that the kernel has loaded the right modules. See the > wiki page > above
for details. >
Followed instructions on wiki page, the attachment tells what I got. I seem to be missing ppdev. Merely adding it to /etc/modules was mentioned in the article but that did not fix it. I don't know if I have a copy of ppdev on the machine to work with.
> Once you get the correct device drivers loaded into the > kernel, > restart cups via the /etc/init.d script. Cups is the > printing system, > if it isn't starting, invoking commands that query it is > premature. > Child exited on signal 15. Whatever that means except that I still don't have a printer.
> > > /proc/sys/dev/parport/parport0/autoprobe gets back no > such > > command even after painfully tracking down that the > file exists > > Stuff under /proc is generally a file or directory, not a > command to
execute. > > > and nor does autoprobe's numbered variations. > > I'm not sure what autoprobe is in this context.
I was just following the advice in one of the articles I found on line.
> > > lp info -v says that the connection is refused. Still sadly true.
> > That suggests that cups isn't running. Ensure the kernel > modules you > need are loaded, then try manually launching cups via the > /etc/init.d/cupsd (or whatever cups uses). You could check > via netstat > -pn to see if it's running.
Netstat -pn gave me several pages of items that were "connected." I did not find a single item that failed.
> > I'd start by ensuring that the appropriate modules are > loaded by the > kernel. Once you get those loaded, I'd (re)start the cups > daemon. If > that gets things into a saner
state, then I'd probably go > about > ensuring that the modules you identify get loaded on boot. > Perhaps it > will be as simple as adding them to /etc/modules (one per > line). > > The relative merits of usb vs lp is lost on me but this > should get you > on your way. > I was just guessing that the upgrade presumed like it has with the monitor that all equipment would be using only the most modern parameters. I wonder if I can simply tell the /etc/modules to load failsafeX right at the beginning and not have to figure out how to rewrite the kernel to buy my older monitor settings. Thanks bs
> > > -- > J. > ____________________________________________________________
|
Attachment:
printerworks
Description: Binary data
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|